Why AI Tools Like ChatGPT Don’t Replace Library Resources
Generative AI tools like ChatGPT do not have access to most scholarly information. That’s because most academic content is not openly available—it’s a commodity controlled by publishers and sold through subscriptions to libraries and institutions.
Key Things to Know
1. AI Doesn’t Have Access to Most Peer-Reviewed Research
- ChatGPT, Claude, and other tools are trained on publicly available web content, not subscription-only databases.
- Most scholarly journals and academic articles are behind paywalls—AI tools can’t legally use them without licensing deals.
- So far, only a few publishers (e.g., Wiley, Taylor & Francis) have allowed partial access to OpenAI.
Bottom line: If we (the library) pay for it, ChatGPT probably can’t see it.
2. Academic Information Is a Commodity
- Libraries spend thousands each year to license scholarly content for students and faculty.
- That includes databases, journal packages, eBooks, and more—none are automatically available to AI platforms.
- Publishers protect their content as paid intellectual property, just like Netflix protects its shows.
3. AI Can Hallucinate Sources or Misinform
- Without access to reliable, current sources, AI tools often make up citations, misrepresent facts, or simplify complex topics.
- Always verify with library databases and peer-reviewed sources—especially for assignments, publications, or research.
Use AI Thoughtfully—with the Library
AI tools can be helpful for:
- Brainstorming search terms
- Summarizing topics
- Drafting outlines or study questions
But for real research, your best source is still your library’s subscribed content and expert staff.
